Evol Ecol Res 1: 549-565 (1999) Full PDF if your library subscribes.
Sexual selection and extinction: The fate of plumage-dimorphic and plumage-monomorphic birds introduced onto islands
Denson Kelly McLain,1* Michael P. Moulton2 and James G. Sanderson2
1Department of Biology, Georgia Southern University, PO Box 8042, Statesboro, GA 30460 and 2Department of Wildlife and Conservation, University of Florida, PO Box 110430, Gainesville, FL 32611-0430, USA
Author to whom all correspondence should be addressed.
Correlates of the fate of 132 species of birds introduced onto one or more oceanic islands (Hawaii, Kauai, Oahu, Tahiti, La Reunion, Saint Helena, Bermuda, New Zealand and Mauritius) were examined. Introduction success rate was less for species with sexually dichromatic plumage than for species with sexually monochromatic plumage. The diet of introduced sexually monochromatic and dichromatic species did not differ, but a broader diet was associated with higher introduction success rates. In a two-way analysis, plumage and diet had significant effects on the introduction success rate. Species nesting primarily in bushes had higher success rates than those nesting on the ground or in trees. Plumage type was not associated with nest location. Both plumage type and nest location had significant effects on introduction success rate in a two-way analysis. Species of introduced sexually dichromatic birds had a lower rate of bi-parental care than did species of introduced sexually monochromatic birds. However, neither the number of nest-tending parents nor clutch size significantly affected the rate of successful introduction. Sexual selection drives the evolution of sexual dichromatism. Thus, our results suggest that sexual selection indirectly promotes extinction of small, colonizing populations encountering new environmental demands by constraining ecological plasticity and evolutionary response to natural selection pressures.
Keywords: community structure, extinction, introduced birds, islands, sexual selection.
DOWNLOAD A FREE, FULL PDF COPY
IF you are connected using the IP of a subscribing institution (library, laboratory, etc.)
or through its VPN.
© 1999 Denson Kelly McLain. All EER articles are copyrighted by their authors. All authors endorse, permit and license Evolutionary Ecology Ltd. to grant its subscribing institutions/libraries the copying privileges specified below without additional consideration or payment to them or to Evolutionary Ecology, Ltd. These endorsements, in writing, are on file in the office of Evolutionary Ecology, Ltd. Consult authors for permission to use any portion of their work in derivative works, compilations or to distribute their work in any commercial manner.
Subscribing institutions/libraries may grant individuals the privilege of making a single copy of an EER article for non-commercial educational or non-commercial research purposes. Subscribing institutions/libraries may also use articles for non-commercial educational purposes by making any number of copies for course packs or course reserve collections. Subscribing institutions/libraries may also loan single copies of articles to non-commercial libraries for educational purposes.
All copies of abstracts and articles must preserve their copyright notice without modification.