Evol Ecol Res 1: 389-409 (1999) Full PDF if your library subscribes.
Predation risk, unequal competitors and the ideal free distribution
Tamara C. Grand
and Lawrence M. Dill
Behavioural Ecology Research Group, Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, British Columbia V5A 1S6, Canada
Address all correspondence to Tamara C. Grand, Department of Zoology, 6270 University Boulevard, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada.
Ideal free distribution (IFD) theory has frequently been used to investigate habitat selection when fitness payoffs are frequency-dependent. To date, however, researchers have not considered the possibility that individuals may simultaneously differ in their ability to compete for resources and their susceptibility to predation. Such differences might be expected to occur as a consequence of differences in body size, morphology or behaviour. Here, we develop a model to investigate the effects of differences in competitive ability and mortality risk on the equilibrium distribution of competitors across habitats. For simplicity, we consider the case of two competitor types competing for resources in an environment containing two habitats: a productive, but risky habitat and a less productive, safer habitat. In general, the model predicts that when individual mortality risk is independent of the density of competitors within a habitat, competitor types will tend to be assorted by competitive ability, with the competitor type experiencing the higher ratio of mortality risk across the habitats occurring predominantly in the safer, but less productive habitat. In contrast, when individual mortality risk within a habitat is diluted by competitor number, the model predicts that both competitor types will tend to aggregate in the same habitat, with the chosen habitat depending on which competitor type experiences the higher ratio of mortality risk across the habitats. When good competitors experience a higher ratio of mortality risk than poor competitors, both competitor types will tend to aggregate in the risky, but productive habitat. However, when poor competitors experience the higher ratio of mortality risk, both competitor types will tend to aggregate in the safer, but less productive habitat. Because our model can be applied to both intra- and interspecific resource competition, its results suggest a new potential mechanism for the co-existence of competitor types within a habitat.
Keywords: habitat selection, ideal free distribution, predation risk, unequal competitors.
DOWNLOAD A FREE, FULL PDF COPY
IF you are connected using the IP of a subscribing institution (library, laboratory, etc.)
or through its VPN.
© 1999 Tamara C. Grand. All EER articles are copyrighted by their authors. All authors endorse, permit and license Evolutionary Ecology Ltd. to grant its subscribing institutions/libraries the copying privileges specified below without additional consideration or payment to them or to Evolutionary Ecology, Ltd. These endorsements, in writing, are on file in the office of Evolutionary Ecology, Ltd. Consult authors for permission to use any portion of their work in derivative works, compilations or to distribute their work in any commercial manner.
Subscribing institutions/libraries may grant individuals the privilege of making a single copy of an EER article for non-commercial educational or non-commercial research purposes. Subscribing institutions/libraries may also use articles for non-commercial educational purposes by making any number of copies for course packs or course reserve collections. Subscribing institutions/libraries may also loan single copies of articles to non-commercial libraries for educational purposes.
All copies of abstracts and articles must preserve their copyright notice without modification.