Evol Ecol Res 2: 667-684 (2000) Full PDF if your library subscribes.
Differences in body mass and oral morphology between the sexes in the Artiodactyla: Evolutionary relationships with sexual segregation
F. Javier Pérez-Barbería1,2 and Iain J. Gordon1
1The Macaulay Land Use Research Institute, Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen AB15 8QH, UK and 2Instituto de Recursos Naturales y Ordenación del Territorio, 13 Independencia, Oviedo 33071, Spain
Author to whom all correspondence should be addressed.
It has been hypothesized that the evolution of sexual dimorphism could lead to sexual dimorphism in trophic structures, mainly the mouthparts, through inter-sexual niche partitioning. This hypothesis is based on the assumption that females select habitats on the basis of their requirements for diets with high nutrient concentrations (due to pregnancy and lactation), whereas males select for habitats with abundant resources (due to their larger body size and higher absolute nutrient requirement). We analysed a data set of the morphological traits of the mouth and teeth, which have been proposed as being functionally related to food selection ability (muzzle width, incisor protrusion), food comminution (molar occlusal surface area) and intake (incisor breadth), in males and females of species from the mammalian order Artiodactyla. Our analyses showed that all of the morphological traits studied covaried isometrically with body mass. The effect of sharing common ancestors did not have a significant effect on oral morphology, which indicates that oral morphology evolved in parallel in both sexes. We detected differences in body mass between the sexes and these differences remained when phylogeny was taken into account. Our results demonstrate that the dimensions of the oral traits result primarily from differences in body mass between the sexes rather than differences in niche adaptation between the sexes. The relationship between sexual dimorphism in body mass and differences in niche partitioning between the sexes in the Artiodactyla is discussed.
Keywords: allometry, body mass, comminution, comparative method, food selection, intake.
DOWNLOAD A FREE, FULL PDF COPY
IF you are connected using the IP of a subscribing institution (library, laboratory, etc.)
or through its VPN.
© 2000 Iain J. Gordon. All EER articles are copyrighted by their authors. All authors endorse, permit and license Evolutionary Ecology Ltd. to grant its subscribing institutions/libraries the copying privileges specified below without additional consideration or payment to them or to Evolutionary Ecology, Ltd. These endorsements, in writing, are on file in the office of Evolutionary Ecology, Ltd. Consult authors for permission to use any portion of their work in derivative works, compilations or to distribute their work in any commercial manner.
Subscribing institutions/libraries may grant individuals the privilege of making a single copy of an EER article for non-commercial educational or non-commercial research purposes. Subscribing institutions/libraries may also use articles for non-commercial educational purposes by making any number of copies for course packs or course reserve collections. Subscribing institutions/libraries may also loan single copies of articles to non-commercial libraries for educational purposes.
All copies of abstracts and articles must preserve their copyright notice without modification.