Evol Ecol Res 3: 877-888 (2001)     Full PDF if your library subscribes.

Cultural artifacts: a comparison of senescence in natural, laboratory-adapted and artificially selected lines of Drosophila melanogaster

Catherine Linnen,1 Marc Tatar2 and Daniel Promislow1*

1Department of Genetics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602-7223 and 2Department of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA



When animals are kept in the laboratory in non-overlapping generations, a high load of mutations with late-acting effects can accumulate over time. This may lead, in turn, to a gradual but steady decline in life expectancy. Selection experiments designed to extend longevity in laboratory-adapted lines may, in fact, simply restore the vigour that was lost from the original lines after they were introduced to the laboratory environment. To test this idea, we compared longevity in virgin males from six strains in the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, including a wild-caught strain recently obtained from the wild, a laboratory strain that has been housed in the laboratory with a 2 week generation time for almost a century, two lines that had been selected for long life span, and two lines that had served as controls in the longevity selection experiment. We found that life span in the wild-caught strain was almost identical to that of the line that had been under selection for long life span for nearly 20 years. Life span in the laboratory strain and the two control lines was also quite similar. In contrast to previous studies, we found that variation in life span among strains was due almost entirely to variation in the intercept of the Gompertz mortality trajectory. Gompertz slopes among all strains were quite similar. We suggest that the effects of laboratory culture may be responsible, in part, for the trade-offs observed between late survival and early fecundity in selection experiments designed to test the antagonistic pleiotropy model of senescence.

Keywords: antagonistic pleiotropy, artificial selection, Drosophila, laboratory culture, mutation accumulation, senescence.

IF you are connected using the IP of a subscribing institution (library, laboratory, etc.)
or through its VPN.


        © 2001 Daniel Promislow. All EER articles are copyrighted by their authors. All authors endorse, permit and license Evolutionary Ecology Ltd. to grant its subscribing institutions/libraries the copying privileges specified below without additional consideration or payment to them or to Evolutionary Ecology, Ltd. These endorsements, in writing, are on file in the office of Evolutionary Ecology, Ltd. Consult authors for permission to use any portion of their work in derivative works, compilations or to distribute their work in any commercial manner.

       Subscribing institutions/libraries may grant individuals the privilege of making a single copy of an EER article for non-commercial educational or non-commercial research purposes. Subscribing institutions/libraries may also use articles for non-commercial educational purposes by making any number of copies for course packs or course reserve collections. Subscribing institutions/libraries may also loan single copies of articles to non-commercial libraries for educational purposes.

       All copies of abstracts and articles must preserve their copyright notice without modification.