Evol Ecol Res 3: 747-757 (2001) Full PDF if your library subscribes.
Competitive ability of parasitized Drosophila larvae
D. Boyle, A.R. Kraaijeveld and H.C.J. Godfray
NERC Centre for Population Biology and Department of Biology, Imperial College at Silwood Park, Ascot, Berkshire SL5 7PY, UK
Author to whom all correspondence should be addressed.
Knowledge of the cost of parasitism and the competitive ability of parasitized larvae is important for understanding the evolution of resistance. We used larvae of two Drosophila species as hosts for two parasitoid species which differ in their counter-resistance mechanism. Parasitism by Leptopilina heterotoma leads to a reduction in survival, in contrast to parasitism by Asobara tabida. This can be explained by L. heterotoma having a counter-defence mechanism that actively interferes with the host’s immune system. Parasitized D. melanogaster larvae, which can encapsulate the parasitoid’s egg to some degree, tend to suffer from a slight reduction in competitive ability, as opposed to parasitized D. subobscura larvae, which are unable to mount an immune response to parasitoids. Combined with earlier work, our results suggest that, in this system, the costs of actual defence are lower than the costs of maintaining an efficient immune system.
Keywords: Asobara tabida, competitive ability, cost of resistance, Drosophila melanogaster, Leptopilina heterotoma, parasitoid.
DOWNLOAD A FREE, FULL PDF COPY
IF you are connected using the IP of a subscribing institution (library, laboratory, etc.)
or through its VPN.
© 2001 A.R. Kraaijeveld. All EER articles are copyrighted by their authors. All authors endorse, permit and license Evolutionary Ecology Ltd. to grant its subscribing institutions/libraries the copying privileges specified below without additional consideration or payment to them or to Evolutionary Ecology, Ltd. These endorsements, in writing, are on file in the office of Evolutionary Ecology, Ltd. Consult authors for permission to use any portion of their work in derivative works, compilations or to distribute their work in any commercial manner.
Subscribing institutions/libraries may grant individuals the privilege of making a single copy of an EER article for non-commercial educational or non-commercial research purposes. Subscribing institutions/libraries may also use articles for non-commercial educational purposes by making any number of copies for course packs or course reserve collections. Subscribing institutions/libraries may also loan single copies of articles to non-commercial libraries for educational purposes.
All copies of abstracts and articles must preserve their copyright notice without modification.