Evol Ecol Res 5: 1083-1102 (2003) Full PDF if your library subscribes.
Predators feeding on behaviourally responsive prey: some implications for classical models of optimal diet choice
Steven L. Lima,* William A. Mitchell and Timothy C. Roth II
Department of Life Sciences, Indiana State University, Terre Haute, IN 47809, USA
Author to whom all correspondence should be addressed.
Hundreds of studies exist on predator foraging behaviour, and the same holds for anti-predator behaviour in prey. However, despite these many studies, almost nothing is known about diet choice by predators that feed on prey with anti-predator behaviour. We addressed this problem theoretically by incorporating anti-predator vigilance into two classical models of diet choice by predators. Vigilance allows prey to detect attack and escape, and prey become more vigilant as the predator focuses more of its attention on a specific prey type. We considered diet models in which predators encounter two types of prey either simultaneously (in mixed-type groups) or sequentially (solitary, randomly distributed prey). In both cases, anti-predator behaviour in prey causes predators to adopt a more generalized diet than one might predict on the basis of classical theory. When prey are encountered simultaneously, increased dietary generalization by predators often reflects broad ‘partial prey preferences’. Here, predators tend to attack both prey types some of the time rather than attack only one prey type all of the time (as suggested by classical theory). When prey are encountered sequentially, increased dietary generalization reflects mainly an increase in the threshold encounter rate necessary to cause the predator to drop the less profitable prey from the diet. However, when sequentially encountered prey require an investment in stalking time (which will be lost to the predator if the prey detects attack), partial preferences may hold over a large part of parameter space. Also possible under this stalking-time scenario is the reversal of prey preferences, in which the inherently less profitable prey is always preferred by the predator. These general deviations from the expectations of classical diet theory reflect, in part, the fact that predators faced with behaviourally responsive prey will often benefit from ‘managing’ the anti-predator responses of those prey.
Keywords: anti-predator behaviour, diet models, foraging theory, partial preferences, predator–prey interactions, prey management, vigilance.
DOWNLOAD A FREE, FULL PDF COPY
IF you are connected using the IP of a subscribing institution (library, laboratory, etc.)
or through its VPN.
© 2003 Steven L. Lima. All EER articles are copyrighted by their authors. All authors endorse, permit and license Evolutionary Ecology Ltd. to grant its subscribing institutions/libraries the copying privileges specified below without additional consideration or payment to them or to Evolutionary Ecology, Ltd. These endorsements, in writing, are on file in the office of Evolutionary Ecology, Ltd. Consult authors for permission to use any portion of their work in derivative works, compilations or to distribute their work in any commercial manner.
Subscribing institutions/libraries may grant individuals the privilege of making a single copy of an EER article for non-commercial educational or non-commercial research purposes. Subscribing institutions/libraries may also use articles for non-commercial educational purposes by making any number of copies for course packs or course reserve collections. Subscribing institutions/libraries may also loan single copies of articles to non-commercial libraries for educational purposes.
All copies of abstracts and articles must preserve their copyright notice without modification.