Evol Ecol Res 6: 261-283 (2004) Full PDF if your library subscribes.
Evolution of rumours that discriminate lying defectors
Mayuko Nakamaru1* and Masakado Kawata2
1Department of Systems Engineering, Shizuoka University, 3-5-1 Johoku, Hamamatsu 432-8561 and 2Division of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Graduate School of Life Sciences, Tohoku University, Aoba, Sendai 980-8578, Japan
Author to whom all correspondence should be addressed.
Discrimination of defectors is the key to the evolution of cooperation. In this paper, we examine the effect of rumours on the evolution of cooperation. ‘Rumour’ is defined as spreading or starting a reputation (concerned with cooperativeness of players), which is passed from one player to another. If players receive a rumour that a given player is a defector, they can avoid being defected by that player. However, to establish and maintain their cooperative relationship, players must also be able to distinguish incorrect rumours from correct ones because the rumour might be untrue. The speed of spreading an incorrect rumour is expected to affect its likelihood of detection and the consequences of detection. In computer simulations (individual-based simulation model), a pair (chosen randomly) plays the Prisoner’s Dilemma game once. Each strategy consists of three rules: (1) a rule for the Prisoner’s Dilemma game; (2) a rule for spreading a rumour; and (3) a rule for starting rumours. We consider 39 strategies in total. Then we classify strategies into several groups. The ADVISOR group of strategies, whose members are cooperative and start rumours about defectors, is not invaded by the LIAR group, whose members are defectors who tell lies, saying ‘I’m cooperative’. ADVISOR (as a group) is not invaded by LIAR even though given pairs (one from each group) seldom meet more than once. If a correct rumour is seldom received, however, and if an incorrect rumour spreads quickly, members of ADVISOR (i.e. members that use strategies from the ADVISOR group) are confused by the incorrect rumour. As a result, ADVISOR is invaded by LIAR. As another group of strategies, we consider CONDITIONAL_ADVISOR, of which each representative member only spreads rumours received from other players who have cooperated with him. Unlike ADVISOR, CONDITIONAL_ADVISOR is able to refuse being invaded by LIAR. On the other hand, if the same conditions hold, but the cooperative strategy is instead based on the individual’s own past experience, that group is invaded by LIAR. This implies that a rumour evolves if cooperators can, using that rumour, detect and punish cheaters – especially a lying defector.
Keywords: honest signalling, language, lying cheater, Prisoner’s Dilemma game, punishment, rumour.
DOWNLOAD A FREE, FULL PDF COPY
IF you are connected using the IP of a subscribing institution (library, laboratory, etc.)
or through its VPN.
© 2004 Mayuko Nakamaru. All EER articles are copyrighted by their authors. All authors endorse, permit and license Evolutionary Ecology Ltd. to grant its subscribing institutions/libraries the copying privileges specified below without additional consideration or payment to them or to Evolutionary Ecology, Ltd. These endorsements, in writing, are on file in the office of Evolutionary Ecology, Ltd. Consult authors for permission to use any portion of their work in derivative works, compilations or to distribute their work in any commercial manner.
Subscribing institutions/libraries may grant individuals the privilege of making a single copy of an EER article for non-commercial educational or non-commercial research purposes. Subscribing institutions/libraries may also use articles for non-commercial educational purposes by making any number of copies for course packs or course reserve collections. Subscribing institutions/libraries may also loan single copies of articles to non-commercial libraries for educational purposes.
All copies of abstracts and articles must preserve their copyright notice without modification.