Evol Ecol Res 6: 799-811 (2004)     Full PDF if your library subscribes.

Assessing the potential for an evolutionary response to rapid environmental change: invasive toads and an Australian snake

Ben L. Phillips,1,2* Gregory P. Brown1 and Richard Shine1

1School of Biological Sciences, A08, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006 and  2Centre for Animal Conservation Genetics, Southern Cross University, Lismore, NSW 2480, Australia

Address all correspondence to Ben L. Phillips, School of Biological Sciences, A08, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
e-mail: phillips@bio.usyd.edu.au

ABSTRACT

Extinctions are ultimately caused by a change in an organism’s environment. Species that can adapt are more likely to persist indefinitely in the face of such changes. We argue that an understanding of the factors encouraging and/or limiting the potential for adaptation is an important consideration in assessing the long-term outcomes of environmental change. Such an approach suggests a cohesive way of assessing the potential for an impact and the long-term consequences of a particular environmental change. We illustrate this approach with a case study of a native Australian snake (the keelback, Tropidonophis mairii) faced with the invasion of an extremely toxic prey item (the cane toad, Bufo marinus). We examine the likely strength of selection, the heritability of toxin resistance and the likelihood of trade-offs or pre-adaptation. We assess an internal trade-off (between toxin resistance and locomotor performance) and an external trade-off (between resistance to the toxin of toads and a native prey species, Litoria dahlii). Our analysis reveals weak selection, high heritability and no trade-offs in resistance to toad toxin, suggesting that keelbacks are capable of mounting a rapid adaptive response to invasion by the cane toad.

Keywords: conservation, contemporary evolution, invasive species, predator–prey.

DOWNLOAD A FREE, FULL PDF COPY
IF you are connected using the IP of a subscribing institution (library, laboratory, etc.)
or through its VPN.

 

        © 2004 Ben L. Phillips. All EER articles are copyrighted by their authors. All authors endorse, permit and license Evolutionary Ecology Ltd. to grant its subscribing institutions/libraries the copying privileges specified below without additional consideration or payment to them or to Evolutionary Ecology, Ltd. These endorsements, in writing, are on file in the office of Evolutionary Ecology, Ltd. Consult authors for permission to use any portion of their work in derivative works, compilations or to distribute their work in any commercial manner.

       Subscribing institutions/libraries may grant individuals the privilege of making a single copy of an EER article for non-commercial educational or non-commercial research purposes. Subscribing institutions/libraries may also use articles for non-commercial educational purposes by making any number of copies for course packs or course reserve collections. Subscribing institutions/libraries may also loan single copies of articles to non-commercial libraries for educational purposes.

       All copies of abstracts and articles must preserve their copyright notice without modification.