Evol Ecol Res 6: 833-842 (2004) Full PDF if your library subscribes.
Is there a relationship between forebrain size and group size in birds?
Guy Beauchamp1* and Esteban Fernández-Juricic2
1Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Montréal, PO Box 5000, St-Hyacinthe, Québec J2S 7C6, Canada and 2Department of Biological Sciences, California State University Long Beach, Peterson Hall 1-109, 1250 Bellflower Boulevard, Long Beach, CA 90840, USA
Author to whom all correspondence should be addressed.
The social complexity hypothesis of brain size evolution posits that demands from group living can favour an enlargement in brain size to allow individuals to process the greater amount of social information generated by group members more efficiently. We tested the hypothesis in birds using estimates of forebrain size from three different data sets. Phylogenetically corrected analyses indicated a lack of relationship between forebrain size and two indices of social complexity, namely mean or maximum flock size in the non-breeding season. Forebrain size was also unrelated to the propensity to flock. In contrast to primates, where the social complexity hypothesis was first proposed, it is conceivable that in birds social demands in the non-breeding season may be insufficient to drive brain size evolution. Future research could focus on the possibility that more specific areas of the avian brain are associated with group size and could be extended to cooperative breeding species that forage in more complex groups over much of the year.
Keywords: birds, flock size, forebrain size, phylogenetic analysis, social complexity hypothesis.
DOWNLOAD A FREE, FULL PDF COPY
IF you are connected using the IP of a subscribing institution (library, laboratory, etc.)
or through its VPN.
© 2004 Guy Beauchamp. All EER articles are copyrighted by their authors. All authors endorse, permit and license Evolutionary Ecology Ltd. to grant its subscribing institutions/libraries the copying privileges specified below without additional consideration or payment to them or to Evolutionary Ecology, Ltd. These endorsements, in writing, are on file in the office of Evolutionary Ecology, Ltd. Consult authors for permission to use any portion of their work in derivative works, compilations or to distribute their work in any commercial manner.
Subscribing institutions/libraries may grant individuals the privilege of making a single copy of an EER article for non-commercial educational or non-commercial research purposes. Subscribing institutions/libraries may also use articles for non-commercial educational purposes by making any number of copies for course packs or course reserve collections. Subscribing institutions/libraries may also loan single copies of articles to non-commercial libraries for educational purposes.
All copies of abstracts and articles must preserve their copyright notice without modification.