Evol Ecol Res 7: 901-913 (2005) Full PDF if your library subscribes.
Conditional strategies in an animal-pollinated plant: size-dependent adjustment of gender and rewards
Jay M. Biernaskie* and Elizabeth Elle
Behavioural Ecology Research Group, Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, British Columbia V5A 1A6, Canada
Address all correspondence to Jay M. Biernaskie, Department of Zoology, University of Toronto, 25 Harbord Street, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3G5, Canada.
Question: How do hermaphroditic flowering plants that must attract animal pollinators allocate to flower production, seed production and nectar production among flowers, as functions of their individual size and the size of their floral display?
Organism: Chamerion (= Epilobium) angustifolium; vertical inflorescences display male-phase flowers above female-phase flowers.
Site: Silver Star Mountain, Vernon, British Columbia, Canada.
Methods: We measured nectar production from male- and female-phase flowers across a range of display sizes. By experiment, we determined the effect of alternative nectar distributions on bumblebee foraging. We measured total flower production (male investment), seed production (female investment) and plant size.
Results: Large floral displays allocated extra nectar production to female-phase flowers. Bumblebees probed fewer male-phase flowers per visit when extra nectar was added to female-phase flowers than when nectar was added more evenly among gender phases. Large plants produced about a third fewer flowers per gram of plant biomass than did the smallest plants. But large plants matured a nearly proportional number of seeds.
Keywords: bumblebees, Chamerion, Epilobium, inflorescence design, nectar gradient, nectar production rate, patch departure, pollen dispensing, sex allocation.
DOWNLOAD A FREE, FULL PDF COPY
IF you are connected using the IP of a subscribing institution (library, laboratory, etc.)
or through its VPN.
© 2005 Jay M. Biernaskie. All EER articles are copyrighted by their authors. All authors endorse, permit and license Evolutionary Ecology Ltd. to grant its subscribing institutions/libraries the copying privileges specified below without additional consideration or payment to them or to Evolutionary Ecology, Ltd. These endorsements, in writing, are on file in the office of Evolutionary Ecology, Ltd. Consult authors for permission to use any portion of their work in derivative works, compilations or to distribute their work in any commercial manner.
Subscribing institutions/libraries may grant individuals the privilege of making a single copy of an EER article for non-commercial educational or non-commercial research purposes. Subscribing institutions/libraries may also use articles for non-commercial educational purposes by making any number of copies for course packs or course reserve collections. Subscribing institutions/libraries may also loan single copies of articles to non-commercial libraries for educational purposes.
All copies of abstracts and articles must preserve their copyright notice without modification.