Evol Ecol Res 8: 1487-1498 (2006) Full PDF if your library subscribes.
Lerner’s theory on the genetic relationship between heterozygosity, genomic co-adaptation, and developmental instability revisited
Cino Pertoldi,1,2* Jesper G. Sørensen,1 Jean R. David3 and Volker Loeschcke1
1Department of Ecology and Genetics, University of Aarhus, DK-8000 Aarhus, Denmark, 2Department of Wildlife Ecology and Biodiversity, National Environmental Research Institute, DK-8410 Rønde, Denmark and 3Laboratoire Populations, Génétique et Evolution, CNRS, 91198 Gif-sur-Yvette cedex, France
Address all correspondence to Cino Pertoldi, Department of Ecology and Genetics, University of Aarhus, Building 540, Ny Munkegade, DK-8000 Aarhus, Denmark.
Question: What is the genetic relationship between heterozygosity and developmental instability?
Methods: Using a new method for the quantification of developmental instability, we compare homozygous strains of Drosophila mercatorum (either parthenogenetic or highly inbred) and of their F1 progeny for the analysis of a symmetrical meristic trait (sternopleural bristle number). The method also implies the choice of samples in which the left–right correlation is close to zero.
Conclusions: In the parthenogenetic strain, developmental instability was seven times greater than in the F1 progeny. In the highly inbred strain, developmental instability was only 2.6 times greater than in the F1 progeny. The greater developmental instability in the parthenogenetic strain may be accounted for by the immediate fixation of a large number of deleterious alleles. In the inbred strain, on the other hand, progressive inbreeding is likely to have purged the genome of some of its genetic load and its most deleterious variants. The greater developmental instability in the parthenogenetic and inbred strains implies a non-linear relationship between heritability (h2) and additive genetic variance (σ 2a) (which are both related to evolutionary potential), which is discussed in an evolutionary context. A linear relationship between the σ 2a of a trait and its h2 is expected if developmental instability is constant and independent of the σ 2a of that trait. If the relationship between the σ 2a of a trait and its developmental instability is negative, an increased σ 2a, which is in the numerator of the h2 equation, will imply a reduced phenotypic variability (σ 2p), which is in the denominator of the heritability equation. Consequently, the concomitant increase in σ 2a and reduction in σ 2p both contribute to an increase in h2 and therefore an increase in evolutionary potential.
Keywords: admixture analysis, developmental instability, environmental variability, homeostasis, Lerner’s conjecture.
DOWNLOAD A FREE, FULL PDF COPY
IF you are connected using the IP of a subscribing institution (library, laboratory, etc.)
or through its VPN.
© 2006 Cino Pertoldi. All EER articles are copyrighted by their authors. All authors endorse, permit and license Evolutionary Ecology Ltd. to grant its subscribing institutions/libraries the copying privileges specified below without additional consideration or payment to them or to Evolutionary Ecology, Ltd. These endorsements, in writing, are on file in the office of Evolutionary Ecology, Ltd. Consult authors for permission to use any portion of their work in derivative works, compilations or to distribute their work in any commercial manner.
Subscribing institutions/libraries may grant individuals the privilege of making a single copy of an EER article for non-commercial educational or non-commercial research purposes. Subscribing institutions/libraries may also use articles for non-commercial educational purposes by making any number of copies for course packs or course reserve collections. Subscribing institutions/libraries may also loan single copies of articles to non-commercial libraries for educational purposes.
All copies of abstracts and articles must preserve their copyright notice without modification.