Evol Ecol Res 9: 409-431 (2007) Full PDF if your library subscribes.
DNA parentage analysis reveals inter-annual variation in selection: results from 19 consecutive brood years in steelhead trout
Todd R. Seamons,1* Paul Bentzen2 and Thomas P. Quinn1
1School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, University of Washington, Box 355020, Seattle, WA 98195, USA and 2Department of Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 4J1, Canada
Author to whom all correspondence should be addressed.
Questions: Given costs and trade-offs, can selection be consistent or strong in animal populations? Is selection on body size and arrival timing, and opportunities for selection, related to indicators of breeding competition (breeding density and sex ratio)?
Methods: Our data set consisted of genetic, phenotypic, and demographic data taken from adults of a small wild population of steelhead trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). We measured the lifetime reproductive success of adults by matching breeding adult offspring to their parents using genetic data and exclusion-based parentage assignment. We calculated the opportunity for selection and estimated selection coefficients using regression analysis.
Results: Selection more often favoured large males and females than small ones, although the strength of selection operating on body size varied among years. Selection on arrival date varied widely in shape, direction, and strength among years. Male-biased sex ratios and greater male breeding density increased the opportunity for selection on males. Higher female breeding density increased the opportunity for selection on females. Sex ratio and breeding density were unrelated to the strength or direction of selection on male or female body size and arrival timing. Selection always favoured large male body size in years when the sex ratio was male biased, but varied greatly in direction among years when the sex ratio was female biased.
Keywords: breeding density, genetic parentage analysis, lifetime reproductive success, Oncorhynchus mykiss, selection, sex ratio.
DOWNLOAD A FREE, FULL PDF COPY
IF you are connected using the IP of a subscribing institution (library, laboratory, etc.)
or through its VPN.
© 2007 Todd R. Seamons. All EER articles are copyrighted by their authors. All authors endorse, permit and license Evolutionary Ecology Ltd. to grant its subscribing institutions/libraries the copying privileges specified below without additional consideration or payment to them or to Evolutionary Ecology, Ltd. These endorsements, in writing, are on file in the office of Evolutionary Ecology, Ltd. Consult authors for permission to use any portion of their work in derivative works, compilations or to distribute their work in any commercial manner.
Subscribing institutions/libraries may grant individuals the privilege of making a single copy of an EER article for non-commercial educational or non-commercial research purposes. Subscribing institutions/libraries may also use articles for non-commercial educational purposes by making any number of copies for course packs or course reserve collections. Subscribing institutions/libraries may also loan single copies of articles to non-commercial libraries for educational purposes.
All copies of abstracts and articles must preserve their copyright notice without modification.