Evol Ecol Res 9: 1145-1161 (2007) Full PDF if your library subscribes.
The relationship between the pollen–ovule ratio and pollen size: another comparative test of a sex allocation hypothesis
Lars Götzenberger,* Walter Durka, Ingolf Kühn and Stefan Klotz
Centre for Environmental Research Leipzig-Halle, Department of Community Ecology, Theodor-Lieser-Strasse 4, 06120 Halle (Saale), Germany
Author to whom all correspondence should be addressed.
Hypothesis: Sex allocation theory predicts that the pollen–ovule ratio should decrease linearly with increasing pollen size among seed plants (Charnov, 1982).
Data examined: We retrieved data for pollen–ovule ratio, pollen size, pollen grain number, and mating system from published literature for 311 angiosperm plant species.
Methods: We used model II regressions on cross-species data as well as on phylogenetically independent contrasts (PIC) to quantify the relationship between the pollen–ovule ratio and pollen size. Partial correlations were applied to test if an association between these two traits arises because of a correlation with a third variable, the number of pollen grains.
Results: A linear negative correlation between the pollen–ovule ratio and pollen size does exist for these plant species, both in phylogenetically corrected and uncorrected data. However, the correlation was not consistently found at the taxon and mating system levels. For virtually all groups investigated, the correlation disappeared when we controlled for the effect of pollen grain number. Thus the correlation between the pollen–ovule ratio and pollen size is spurious.
Conclusions: Considering male function, the pollen–ovule ratio depends on the number of pollen grains produced by a flower but not on the size of the pollen grains. For the ‘male part’ of Charnov’s model, its validity can be called into question.
Keywords: comparative analysis, mating system, pollen–ovule ratio, pollen size, sex allocation.
DOWNLOAD A FREE, FULL PDF COPY
IF you are connected using the IP of a subscribing institution (library, laboratory, etc.)
or through its VPN.
© 2007 Lars Götzenberger. All EER articles are copyrighted by their authors. All authors endorse, permit and license Evolutionary Ecology Ltd. to grant its subscribing institutions/libraries the copying privileges specified below without additional consideration or payment to them or to Evolutionary Ecology, Ltd. These endorsements, in writing, are on file in the office of Evolutionary Ecology, Ltd. Consult authors for permission to use any portion of their work in derivative works, compilations or to distribute their work in any commercial manner.
Subscribing institutions/libraries may grant individuals the privilege of making a single copy of an EER article for non-commercial educational or non-commercial research purposes. Subscribing institutions/libraries may also use articles for non-commercial educational purposes by making any number of copies for course packs or course reserve collections. Subscribing institutions/libraries may also loan single copies of articles to non-commercial libraries for educational purposes.
All copies of abstracts and articles must preserve their copyright notice without modification.