Evol Ecol Res 11: 95-107 (2009) Full PDF if your library subscribes.
For a few males more: do changes in sex ratio predict reproductive success and offspring survival?
Ethologie-Evolution-Ecologie, Université de Rennes 1, Rennes, France
Correspondence: T. Lodé, UMR-CNRS 6552, Ethologie-Evolution-Ecologie, Université de Rennes 1, Campus de Beaulieu, 35042 Rennes, France.
Background: Sexual selection theory predicts that if the operational sex ratio is male-biased, females will be choosy, whereas males, for the most part, will compete with each other for mates. However, the influence of the operational sex ratio on reproductive success and offspring survival has rarely been studied.
Question: Does the operational sex ratio influence reproductive success and offspring survival?
Methods: I surveyed the sex ratio and reproductive success of agile frog (Rana dalmatina) populations at 19 breeding sites in western France. I assessed reproductive success using ratios among the number of clutches, the number of froglets, and the daily number of adult frogs. I also determined the survival rate of offspring.
Conclusions: Males dominated in 90% of ponds; the mean adult sex ratio and operational sex ratio ranged from 0.84 to 3.14 and from 2.84 to 13.71 respectively. The number of post-metamorphic froglets per clutch averaged 9.37 (S.D. = 2.37). Variations in the adult sex ratio and operational sex ratio did affect reproductive success. Froglet survival was diminished in populations with higher proportions of males. Furthermore, although each female produced a single clutch regardless of sex ratio, higher proportions of males depressed the average number of clutches per male. Evidently, adult male competition and sexual conflict reduce the fitness of both males and females.
Keywords: fitness, mating success, operational sex ratio, survival.
DOWNLOAD A FREE, FULL PDF COPY
IF you are connected using the IP of a subscribing institution (library, laboratory, etc.)
or through its VPN.
© 2009 Thierry Lodé. All EER articles are copyrighted by their authors. All authors endorse, permit and license Evolutionary Ecology Ltd. to grant its subscribing institutions/libraries the copying privileges specified below without additional consideration or payment to them or to Evolutionary Ecology, Ltd. These endorsements, in writing, are on file in the office of Evolutionary Ecology, Ltd. Consult authors for permission to use any portion of their work in derivative works, compilations or to distribute their work in any commercial manner.
Subscribing institutions/libraries may grant individuals the privilege of making a single copy of an EER article for non-commercial educational or non-commercial research purposes. Subscribing institutions/libraries may also use articles for non-commercial educational purposes by making any number of copies for course packs or course reserve collections. Subscribing institutions/libraries may also loan single copies of articles to non-commercial libraries for educational purposes.
All copies of abstracts and articles must preserve their copyright notice without modification.