Evol Ecol Res 11: 1217-1233 (2009) Full PDF if your library subscribes.
The author retracted this paper.
Morphological and dietary differences between individuals are weakly but positively correlated within a population of threespine stickleback
Daniel I. Bolnick and Jeffrey S. Paull
Section of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA
Correspondence: D.I. Bolnick, Section of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at Austin, One University Station C0930, Austin, TX 78712, USA.
Background: Many theoretical models of speciation and niche evolution assume that the ecological similarity between conspecific individuals depends on their phenotypic similarity. Thus, competition between individuals is expected to depend on their phenotypic similarity. Theoretical models often assume that this intraspecific competition function is Gaussian.
Questions: Are morphological similarity and diet similarity positively correlated? If so, is this relationship non-linear?
Data: Stomach contents, stable isotope ratios (δ 13C and δ 15N), and trophic morphology (standard length, gape width, body width, gill raker number, and gill raker length) for 265 threespine sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus) from a single population from a lake in British Columbia.
Analysis: We calculated the diet similarity and morphological similarity between all pairs of individuals in our sample. We examined the correlation between diet and morphological similarity, and tested whether the relationship exhibits any non-linearity.
Conclusions: Similarity in trophic morphology is correlated with dietary similarity between individuals. However, both body size and trophic morphology explained remarkably small percentages of the variance in diet overlap. Also, we found no evidence of curvature in the intraspecific competition function.
Keywords: adaptive dynamics, Gasterosteus aculeatus, individual specialization, niche evolution, niche variation.
DOWNLOAD A FREE, FULL PDF COPY
IF you are connected using the IP of a subscribing institution (library, laboratory, etc.)
or through its VPN.
© 2009 Daniel I. Bolnick. All EER articles are copyrighted by their authors. All authors endorse, permit and license Evolutionary Ecology Ltd. to grant its subscribing institutions/libraries the copying privileges specified below without additional consideration or payment to them or to Evolutionary Ecology, Ltd. These endorsements, in writing, are on file in the office of Evolutionary Ecology, Ltd. Consult authors for permission to use any portion of their work in derivative works, compilations or to distribute their work in any commercial manner.
Subscribing institutions/libraries may grant individuals the privilege of making a single copy of an EER article for non-commercial educational or non-commercial research purposes. Subscribing institutions/libraries may also use articles for non-commercial educational purposes by making any number of copies for course packs or course reserve collections. Subscribing institutions/libraries may also loan single copies of articles to non-commercial libraries for educational purposes.
All copies of abstracts and articles must preserve their copyright notice without modification.