Evol Ecol Res 12: 119-129 (2010) Full PDF if your library subscribes.
Discrimination among floral resources by an obligately pollinating seed-eating moth: host-marking signals and pollination and florivory cues
Katherine C. Horn and J. Nathaniel Holland
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Rice University, Houston, Texas, USA
Correspondence: J.N. Holland, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Rice University, MS-170, 6100 Main St., Houston, TX 77005, USA.
Background: For oviposition, some insects exploit small discrete food items from which their larvae then develop but do not disperse. In particular, senita moths exploit senita cacti by obligately pollinating and ovipositing floral resources. Larvae consume the fruit but do not disperse among them. Previous studies have shown that moth oviposition occurs in a non-random, uniform distribution among floral resources (one egg per flower).
Question: Do host-marking pheromones of senita moths, pollinated stigmas, and florivory act as signals and cues that aid them to avoid ovipositing in the previously exploited floral resources?
Methods: We measured rates of moth pollination and oviposition of flowers in a series of experiments. In one experiment, we simulated pheromone deposition by placing an extract of moth abdomens on flowers. In another, we compared oviposition rates on hand-pollinated flowers with those on controls. In a third, we simulated florivory by damaging stigmas, anthers or petals.
Results: Moth exploitation of floral resources was higher for control than abdomen-extract flowers. Control flowers received more ovipositions than those with pollinated stigmas. Finally, damaging the stigmas of flowers reduced ovipositions, although neither anther nor petal damage did so.
Conclusion: Host-marking signals and the cues of pollinated stigmas and of florivory aid in the differential exploitation of floral resources by senita moths and their uniform distribution of eggs among flowers.
Keywords: cue, florivory, oviposition, pheromone, signal.
DOWNLOAD A FREE, FULL PDF COPY
IF you are connected using the IP of a subscribing institution (library, laboratory, etc.)
or through its VPN.
© 2010 J. Nathaniel Holland. All EER articles are copyrighted by their authors. All authors endorse, permit and license Evolutionary Ecology Ltd. to grant its subscribing institutions/libraries the copying privileges specified below without additional consideration or payment to them or to Evolutionary Ecology, Ltd. These endorsements, in writing, are on file in the office of Evolutionary Ecology, Ltd. Consult authors for permission to use any portion of their work in derivative works, compilations or to distribute their work in any commercial manner.
Subscribing institutions/libraries may grant individuals the privilege of making a single copy of an EER article for non-commercial educational or non-commercial research purposes. Subscribing institutions/libraries may also use articles for non-commercial educational purposes by making any number of copies for course packs or course reserve collections. Subscribing institutions/libraries may also loan single copies of articles to non-commercial libraries for educational purposes.
All copies of abstracts and articles must preserve their copyright notice without modification.