Evol Ecol Res 12: 35-46 (2010)     Full PDF if your library subscribes.

On nestedness in ecological networks

Lucas N. Joppa1, José M. Montoya2,3, Richard Solé3,4, Jim Sanderson5 and Stuart L. Pimm1

1Nicholas School of the Environment and Earth Sciences, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA,  2Institute of Marine Sciences, ICM-SCIC, Paseo Maritimo de la Barceloneta, Barcelona, Spain, 3Complex Systems Lab, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain, 4Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA and 5Wildlife Conservation Network, Los Altos, California, USA

Correspondence: S.L. Pimm, Nicholas School of the Environment and Earth Sciences, Duke University, Box 90328, Durham, NC 23708, USA.
e-mail: StuartPimm@me.com


Questions: Are interaction patterns in species interaction networks different from what one expects by chance alone? In particular, are these networks nested – a pattern where resources taken by more specialized consumers form a proper subset of those taken by more generalized consumers?

Organisms: Fifty-nine and 42 networks of mutualistic and host–parasitoid interactions, respectively.

Analytical methods: For each network, the observed degree of nestedness is compared with the distribution of nestedness values derived from a collection of 1000 random networks. Those networks with nestedness values lower than 95% of all random values are considered ‘unusually nested’. The analysis considers two different metrics of nestedness and five different network randomization algorithms, each of which differs in the ecological assumptions imposed.

Results: Most ecological networks are unusually nested when compared with loosely constrained random networks. Comparisons with highly constrained networks temper these findings, but we still report a significant preponderance of nested networks (typically those with the most species).

Conclusions: Bascompte et al. (2003) previously showed most observed mutualistic networks to be unusually nested. Later work using more ecologically realistic randomization algorithms cast doubt on those results. Across the largest set of species interactions considered to date, we conclude that an unexpectedly large number of interaction networks are patterned in a non-random manner.

Keywords: ecological network, food web, host–parasitoid, mutualism, nestedness, null model.

IF you are connected using the IP of a subscribing institution (library, laboratory, etc.)
or through its VPN.


        © 2010 Stuart L. Pimm. All EER articles are copyrighted by their authors. All authors endorse, permit and license Evolutionary Ecology Ltd. to grant its subscribing institutions/libraries the copying privileges specified below without additional consideration or payment to them or to Evolutionary Ecology, Ltd. These endorsements, in writing, are on file in the office of Evolutionary Ecology, Ltd. Consult authors for permission to use any portion of their work in derivative works, compilations or to distribute their work in any commercial manner.

       Subscribing institutions/libraries may grant individuals the privilege of making a single copy of an EER article for non-commercial educational or non-commercial research purposes. Subscribing institutions/libraries may also use articles for non-commercial educational purposes by making any number of copies for course packs or course reserve collections. Subscribing institutions/libraries may also loan single copies of articles to non-commercial libraries for educational purposes.

       All copies of abstracts and articles must preserve their copyright notice without modification.