Evol Ecol Res 12: 667-683 (2010) Full PDF if your library subscribes.
Evidence for Rensch’s rule in an orb-web spider with moderate sexual size dimorphism
Anja Kleinteich and Jutta M. Schneider
Zoological Institute and Museum, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
Correspondence: A. Kleinteich, Zoological Institute and Museum, University of Hamburg, Martin-Luther-King-Platz 3, 20146 Hamburg, Germany.
Background: The sexes are often subject to different selection regimes. In some cases, these generate sexual size dimorphism. Rensch’s rule postulates that male body size is more variable than female body size. The rule applies to many but not all animal groups. In spiders, sexual size dimorphism is extreme in cases of female gigantism and male dwarfism. These more widely studied species with extreme reversed sexual size dimorphism do not follow Rensch’s rule.
Question: Do orb-web spiders with moderate sexual size dimorphism follow Rensch’s rule?
Organism: The bridge spider, Larinioides sclopetarius, with moderate sexual size dimorphism and high developmental plasticity. We tested its sex specific variation in size and age at maturity.
Methods: We experimentally varied food supply during spider development. We measured leg length (as a measure for body size), body weight, and development time for 267 male and female spiders from 15 matrilines.
Results: Females reacted to decreasing food levels by prolonging developmental time and adding extra moults. Their body size was unaffected by the food supply. However, males that developed with a poor diet, despite adding extra moults and increasing their age of maturation, matured at smaller sizes than did well-fed males. Thus our results support Rensch’s rule because male body size was affected by diet whereas female body size was not.
Keywords: bridge spider, genotype × environment interaction, Larinioides sclopetarius, life history, Rensch’s rule, sexual size dimorphism.
DOWNLOAD A FREE, FULL PDF COPY
IF you are connected using the IP of a subscribing institution (library, laboratory, etc.)
or through its VPN.
© 2010 Anja Kleinteich. All EER articles are copyrighted by their authors. All authors endorse, permit and license Evolutionary Ecology Ltd. to grant its subscribing institutions/libraries the copying privileges specified below without additional consideration or payment to them or to Evolutionary Ecology, Ltd. These endorsements, in writing, are on file in the office of Evolutionary Ecology, Ltd. Consult authors for permission to use any portion of their work in derivative works, compilations or to distribute their work in any commercial manner.
Subscribing institutions/libraries may grant individuals the privilege of making a single copy of an EER article for non-commercial educational or non-commercial research purposes. Subscribing institutions/libraries may also use articles for non-commercial educational purposes by making any number of copies for course packs or course reserve collections. Subscribing institutions/libraries may also loan single copies of articles to non-commercial libraries for educational purposes.
All copies of abstracts and articles must preserve their copyright notice without modification.