Evol Ecol Res 12: 739-749 (2010) Full PDF if your library subscribes.
Observations on non-additive predation: birds and grasshoppers
Gary E. Belovsky and J.B. Slade
Environmental Research Center and Department of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana, USA
Correspondence: G.E. Belovsky, Environmental Research Center and Department of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA.
Background: Classic predator–prey theory assumes that predatory mortality is additive with other sources of mortality, but predatory mortality can be non-additive. If predators preferentially kill individuals already ‘doomed’ from other mortality causes, then predation can be less than additive. If predators preferentially kill individuals more likely to survive, then predation can be greater than additive. In either case, to be non-additive, predation must modify other causes of mortality such as intraspecific competition, decreasing it in the former case and increasing it in the latter. Non-additive predation also can modify selective pressures of predation and is seldom considered except when prey are much larger than their predators.
Question: Can non-additive predation be observed in the most common type of predator–prey system (prey much smaller than their predators) where this is considered very unlikely?
Organisms: Two sympatric grasshoppers and their avian predators.
Field site: National Bison Range, Montana, USA.
Methods: Field experiments to determine: (1) whether better foraging individuals survive longer in the absence of predators or if they die from non-predatory causes in the presence of predators; (2) whether predators preferentially kill better or poorer foragers; and (3) how predators affect prey populations.
Conclusions: Both grasshoppers exhibit intraspecific competition with better foragers surviving longer. Both experience high predation rates, but their populations respond differently to predation. One increased with predation, due to the non-additive effect of the predators preferentially killing poor foragers, and thereby diminishing intraspecific competition, which counters predatory mortality. The other population declined more than expected with predation due to the non-additive effect of the predators preferentially killing good foragers, and thereby intensifying intraspecific competition.
Keywords: birds, compensatory mortality, foraging, grasshoppers, non-additive mortality, predation.
DOWNLOAD A FREE, FULL PDF COPY
IF you are connected using the IP of a subscribing institution (library, laboratory, etc.)
or through its VPN.
© 2010 Gary E. Belovsky. All EER articles are copyrighted by their authors. All authors endorse, permit and license Evolutionary Ecology Ltd. to grant its subscribing institutions/libraries the copying privileges specified below without additional consideration or payment to them or to Evolutionary Ecology, Ltd. These endorsements, in writing, are on file in the office of Evolutionary Ecology, Ltd. Consult authors for permission to use any portion of their work in derivative works, compilations or to distribute their work in any commercial manner.
Subscribing institutions/libraries may grant individuals the privilege of making a single copy of an EER article for non-commercial educational or non-commercial research purposes. Subscribing institutions/libraries may also use articles for non-commercial educational purposes by making any number of copies for course packs or course reserve collections. Subscribing institutions/libraries may also loan single copies of articles to non-commercial libraries for educational purposes.
All copies of abstracts and articles must preserve their copyright notice without modification.