Evol Ecol Res 13: 35-44 (2011) Full PDF if your library subscribes.
The evolution of sexual bill-size dimorphism in shorebirds: a morphometric test of the resource partitioning hypothesis
Silke Nebel1,2 and Graham J. Thompson1
1Department of Biology and 2Advanced Facility for Avian Research, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
Correspondence: S. Nebel, Department of Biology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario N6A 5B7, Canada.
Question: Is sexual dimorphism in shorebirds an adaptation to reduce resource competition between males and females?
Hypothesis: If selection for resource partitioning between the sexes has contributed to dimorphism, then the degree of sexual size dimorphism (SSD) in resource-exploiting characters – such as those related to feeding – should exceed that expected from sexual selection alone.
Data: Morphometric data from 151 species of shorebirds (Charadriiformes).
Methods: We compared the degree and direction of SSD between a resource-exploiting trait (bill length) and a non-resource-exploiting trait (body size). If bill-SSD exceeds body size-SSD, then resource partitioning may contribute to morphological differentiation of the sexes in shorebirds. We also tested whether SSD is more pronounced in migrant than non-migrant species.
Conclusions: From species level data it appears that bill dimorphism is more pronounced than body size dimorphism, and is more common in migrant than non-migrant shorebirds. This observation from extant taxa suggests a role for resource partitioning in promoting SSD. The phylogenetic effect on both of these correlations is significant, however, to the extent that shared ancestry, rather than contemporary selection, is sufficient to explain why resource-exploiting traits and migrants are more sexually dimorphic.
Keywords: bird migration, resource partitioning hypothesis, sexual bill-size dimorphism, sexual selection, shorebirds.
DOWNLOAD A FREE, FULL PDF COPY
IF you are connected using the IP of a subscribing institution (library, laboratory, etc.)
or through its VPN.
© 2011 Silke Nebel. All EER articles are copyrighted by their authors. All authors endorse, permit and license Evolutionary Ecology Ltd. to grant its subscribing institutions/libraries the copying privileges specified below without additional consideration or payment to them or to Evolutionary Ecology, Ltd. These endorsements, in writing, are on file in the office of Evolutionary Ecology, Ltd. Consult authors for permission to use any portion of their work in derivative works, compilations or to distribute their work in any commercial manner.
Subscribing institutions/libraries may grant individuals the privilege of making a single copy of an EER article for non-commercial educational or non-commercial research purposes. Subscribing institutions/libraries may also use articles for non-commercial educational purposes by making any number of copies for course packs or course reserve collections. Subscribing institutions/libraries may also loan single copies of articles to non-commercial libraries for educational purposes.
All copies of abstracts and articles must preserve their copyright notice without modification.