Evol Ecol Res 14: 779-785 (2012) Full PDF if your library subscribes.
Magic cues versus magic preferences in speciation
Martine E. Maan1,2,3 and Ole Seehausen2,3
1Centre of Behaviour and Neurosciences, Behavioural Biology, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands, 2Eawag Centre of Ecology, Evolution and Biogeochemistry, Kastanienbaum, Switzerland and 3Institute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
Correspondence: M.E. Maan, Centre of Behaviour and Neurosciences, Behavioural Biology, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 7, 9747 AG Groningen, Netherlands.
Question: How does divergent natural selection lead to divergence in mating traits and the evolution of reproductive isolation?
Background: Ecological speciation of non-allopatric taxa usually requires the evolution of an association between selective mating and the traits underlying ecological adaptation. ‘Magic traits’ affect both ecological fitness and assortative mating and may therefore mediate rapid evolution of reproductive isolation.
Problem: When assortative mating is mediated by separate preferences and cues, as opposed to being based on trait similarity (e.g. assortment by body size or habitat), pre-mating reproductive isolation between non-allopatric populations often requires divergence in both mating preferences and mating cues. However, most proposed cases of magic trait speciation rely on observation of divergent mating cues alone, leaving the consequences for reproductive isolation uncertain.
Solution: We propose that a distinction should be made between mating cues and mating preferences when documenting divergent natural selection on mating traits. We argue that immediate effects of ecological adaptation on mating preferences, through direct selection or through pleiotropy, will drive divergence in both preferences and traits much more predictably than ecological selection on mating cues. The distinction between ‘magic cues’ and ‘magic preferences’ is critical for evaluating the evolutionary consequences of divergent selection on mating traits, and implies a need for increased research effort into documenting variation in mating preferences in diverging taxa.
Keywords: direct selection, indirect selection, linkage disequilibrium, mate choice, sexual selection.
DOWNLOAD A FREE, FULL PDF COPY
IF you are connected using the IP of a subscribing institution (library, laboratory, etc.)
or through its VPN.
© 2012 Martine E. Maan. All EER articles are copyrighted by their authors. All authors endorse, permit and license Evolutionary Ecology Ltd. to grant its subscribing institutions/libraries the copying privileges specified below without additional consideration or payment to them or to Evolutionary Ecology, Ltd. These endorsements, in writing, are on file in the office of Evolutionary Ecology, Ltd. Consult authors for permission to use any portion of their work in derivative works, compilations or to distribute their work in any commercial manner.
Subscribing institutions/libraries may grant individuals the privilege of making a single copy of an EER article for non-commercial educational or non-commercial research purposes. Subscribing institutions/libraries may also use articles for non-commercial educational purposes by making any number of copies for course packs or course reserve collections. Subscribing institutions/libraries may also loan single copies of articles to non-commercial libraries for educational purposes.
All copies of abstracts and articles must preserve their copyright notice without modification.