Evol Ecol Res 15: 331-341 (2013) Full PDF if your library subscribes.
The potential additive and non-additive benefits of mate choice in the threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus)
Carl Smith and Rowena Spence
School of Biology, University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews, Fife, UK
Correspondence: C. Smith, School of Biology, University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews, Fife KY16 8LB, UK. E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
Hypothesis: The genetic benefits of female mating preferences can be additive (good alleles’), non-additive (‘compatible alleles’) or both, and the importance of each may be population dependent.
Organism: Threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) from two independent natural populations.
Location: Two adjacent sites in Scotland, one a pond with high stickleback density and high parasite prevalence, the other a river with low stickleback density and fish predators.
Methods: In vitro fertilizations in a North Carolina Type II breeding design to estimate the contribution of additive and non-additive genetic variation to early offspring survival.
Results: In both populations we detected significant additive maternal effects. These effects were largely explained by variance in egg size, though not entirely so. In the pond population there were significant male additive genetic effects on offspring survival, implicating a role for ‘good alleles’, but not non-additive effects. In the river population there were significant additive and non-additive effects, implicating a role both for ‘good alleles’ and genetic compatibility. Different populations of the same species may vary in the mechanism by which sexual selection operates.
Keywords: additive genetic benefit, genetic compatibility, good genes, major histocompatibility complex, mating system, non-additive genetic benefit, olfactory cues, sexual selection, teleost, stickleback.
DOWNLOAD A FREE, FULL PDF COPY
IF you are connected using the IP of a subscribing institution (library, laboratory, etc.)
or through its VPN.
© 2013 Carl Smith. All EER articles are copyrighted by their authors. All authors endorse, permit and license Evolutionary Ecology Ltd. to grant its subscribing institutions/libraries the copying privileges specified below without additional consideration or payment to them or to Evolutionary Ecology, Ltd. These endorsements, in writing, are on file in the office of Evolutionary Ecology, Ltd. Consult authors for permission to use any portion of their work in derivative works, compilations or to distribute their work in any commercial manner.
Subscribing institutions/libraries may grant individuals the privilege of making a single copy of an EER article for non-commercial educational or non-commercial research purposes. Subscribing institutions/libraries may also use articles for non-commercial educational purposes by making any number of copies for course packs or course reserve collections. Subscribing institutions/libraries may also loan single copies of articles to non-commercial libraries for educational purposes.
All copies of abstracts and articles must preserve their copyright notice without modification.