Evol Ecol Res 16: 617-629 (2015)     Full PDF if your library subscribes.

Environment-dependent trade-offs and phenotypic plasticity in metamorphic timing

Hirofumi Michimae1, Ayumi Tezuka2, Takeshi Emura3 and Osamu Kishida2

1School of Pharmacy, Department of Clinical Medicine (Biostatistics), Kitasato University, Tokyo, Japan,  2Teshio Experimental Forest, Field Science Center for Northern Biosphere, Hokkaido University, Hokkaido, Japan and  3National Central University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan

Correspondence: H. Michimae, School of Pharmacy, Department of Clinical Medicine (Biostatistics), Kitasato University, Tokyo 108-8641, Japan.
e-mail: michimaeh@pharm.kitasato-u.ac.jp


Background: Fitness trade-offs of plastic traits between alternative environments are a prerequisite for the evolution of phenotypic plasticity; however, the costs associated with plastic traits have yet to be determined. Most empirical studies have assessed the costs of plastic traits by investigating just two environments (to elicit plasticity), and only one or two environments to evaluate the consequences of plasticity. In contrast, in nature, organisms are constantly subjected to multiple environments, and the expression and magnitude of the costs of plastic traits are occasionally context-dependent.

Objective: Analyse the costs of plastic traits across multiple environments.

Methods: We determined the benefits and costs of two plastic responses (predator- and prey-induced morphologies) of larvae of the salamander Hynobius retardatus to larval survival, time to metamorphosis, and body size at metamorphosis in three different environments [using tadpoles of an anuran frog as prey, larvae of a predatory dragonfly, or no change agent (conspecific larvae only)].

Results: The benefits of the alternative phenotypes were evident in the two inducing environments, but the costs were greater or more easily detected in crossover environments. The trade-offs appeared in combinations in the crossover environments, and thus were context-dependent.

Conclusions: The cross-environmental costs of plastic traits are necessary for the evolution of phenotypic plasticity. Our findings highlight the importance of measuring the costs and benefits of plastic traits across multiple environments.

Keywords: competing risk, Cox proportional hazards model, metamorphosis, survival analysis.

IF you are connected using the IP of a subscribing institution (library, laboratory, etc.)
or through its VPN.


        © 2015 Hirofumi Michimae. All EER articles are copyrighted by their authors. All authors endorse, permit and license Evolutionary Ecology Ltd. to grant its subscribing institutions/libraries the copying privileges specified below without additional consideration or payment to them or to Evolutionary Ecology, Ltd. These endorsements, in writing, are on file in the office of Evolutionary Ecology, Ltd. Consult authors for permission to use any portion of their work in derivative works, compilations or to distribute their work in any commercial manner.

       Subscribing institutions/libraries may grant individuals the privilege of making a single copy of an EER article for non-commercial educational or non-commercial research purposes. Subscribing institutions/libraries may also use articles for non-commercial educational purposes by making any number of copies for course packs or course reserve collections. Subscribing institutions/libraries may also loan single copies of articles to non-commercial libraries for educational purposes.

       All copies of abstracts and articles must preserve their copyright notice without modification.