Evol Ecol Res 18: 305-322 (2017) Full PDF if your library subscribes.
The evolution of correlations between behavioural and morphological defence in Alaskan threespine stickleback fish (Gasterosteus aculeatus):
evidence for trait compensation and co-specialization
Craig A. Marshall1 and Matthew A. Wund2
1Department of Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA and 2Department of Biology, The College of New Jersey, Ewing, New Jersey, USA
Correspondence: C.A. Marshall, Department of Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA. email: email@example.com
Background: Prey often make behavioural and morphological adaptations to avoid predation, and these alternative defence mechanisms may either compensate for, or reinforce, one another.
Objective: We examined correlations between anti-predator behaviour and morphology in threespine stickleback fish (Gasterosteus aculeatus) in four environments distinguished by their predation histories: marine/anadromous populations co-existing with native predatory fish (representative of the ancestral environment), and three freshwater environments with native, introduced, and no predatory fish, respectively. To determine whether morphological and behavioural defences reinforce one another (trait co-specialization) or whether they represent alternative strategies for defence (trait compensation), we related morphology of laboratory-reared stickleback to the intensity of their responses to a simulated predator attack, which had previously been assessed (Wund et al., 2015).
Methods: Eight aspects of stickleback morphology were measured, all of which loaded heavily and positively on a single principal component that accounted for 61.3% of the variation in traits. Pearson correlation was used to determine whether PC1 was associated with the intensity of anti-predator response.
Results: A weak negative correlation was observed between anti-predator behaviour and morphology overall. However, considering each predation environment separately revealed that populations from marine and freshwater environments containing native predatory fish displayed trait co-specialization (positive correlation) between armour and behaviour, while those from environments with recently introduced predatory trout displayed trait compensation (negative correlation). No correlation was observed in populations lacking these predators. Not all populations within the ‘introduced predatory fish’ category showed the same pattern of relationship, however, indicating that additional factors mediate the co-evolutionary dynamics of anti-predator behaviour and morphology. Results were similar whether we considered size-standardized or unstandardized morphological traits.
Conclusion: Our results suggest that over the long term, the two types of defence co-evolve to reinforce one another, but within the first few decades of exposure to predatory fish, anti-predator behaviour compensates for diminished morphological defences.
Keywords: anti-predator, behaviour, compensation, co-specialization, morphology, threespine stickleback.
DOWNLOAD A FREE, FULL PDF COPY
IF you are connected using the IP of a subscribing institution (library, laboratory, etc.)
or through its VPN.
© 2017 Craig A. Marshall. All EER articles are copyrighted by their authors. All authors endorse, permit and license Evolutionary Ecology Ltd. to grant its subscribing institutions/libraries the copying privileges specified below without additional consideration or payment to them or to Evolutionary Ecology, Ltd. These endorsements, in writing, are on file in the office of Evolutionary Ecology, Ltd. Consult authors for permission to use any portion of their work in derivative works, compilations or to distribute their work in any commercial manner.
Subscribing institutions/libraries may grant individuals the privilege of making a single copy of an EER article for non-commercial educational or non-commercial research purposes. Subscribing institutions/libraries may also use articles for non-commercial educational purposes by making any number of copies for course packs or course reserve collections. Subscribing institutions/libraries may also loan single copies of articles to non-commercial libraries for educational purposes.
All copies of abstracts and articles must preserve their copyright notice without modification.