Evol Ecol Res 8: 943-957 (2006) Full PDF if your library subscribes.
Fitness consequences of female preference for male pheromones in Tenebrio molitor
Anssi Vainikka,1* Otto Seppälä,1 Katja Löytynoja1 and Markus J. Rantala2
1Department of Biological and Environmental Science, University of Jyväskylä, PO Box 35 (YAC341), FIN-40014 Jyväskylä and 2Department of Biology, Section of Ecology, University of Turku, FIN-20024 Turku, Finland
Address all correspondence to Anssi Vainikka, Institute of Coastal Research, Swedish Board of Fisheries, PO Box 109, SE-74071 Öregrund, Sweden.
Hypothesis: Sexual selection is maintained by ‘good genes’ effects of mate choice on females, and by mating with males with preferable pheromones females increase their fitness.
Organism: Cultured mealworm beetles (Tenebrio molitor).
Methods: Male mealworm beetles were paired by mass and age, their pheromones were collected by confining them on filter paper, and the two halves of the filter paper disks were presented to two mass-matched females. Females and males were then allowed to mate in three ways: (1) Among females preferring pheromones of the same male, one female mated with the male who had the preferred pheromones and the other female with the male who had the non-preferred pheromones. Among females preferring separate disks, both females mated either with (2) the male with the preferred pheromones or (3) the male with the non-preferred pheromones.
Results: Females made a clear choice between the pheromone disks, but preference for male pheromones did not translate into the number of live or dead offspring. However, females who preferred the disk of the same male and mated with the male with the preferred pheromones lived longer than the females who mated with the male with the non-preferred pheromones.
Keywords: fitness, good genes, handicap, lifespan, sexual conflict.
DOWNLOAD A FREE, FULL PDF COPY
IF you are connected using the IP of a subscribing institution (library, laboratory, etc.)
or through its VPN.
© 2006 Anssi Vainikka. All EER articles are copyrighted by their authors. All authors endorse, permit and license Evolutionary Ecology Ltd. to grant its subscribing institutions/libraries the copying privileges specified below without additional consideration or payment to them or to Evolutionary Ecology, Ltd. These endorsements, in writing, are on file in the office of Evolutionary Ecology, Ltd. Consult authors for permission to use any portion of their work in derivative works, compilations or to distribute their work in any commercial manner.
Subscribing institutions/libraries may grant individuals the privilege of making a single copy of an EER article for non-commercial educational or non-commercial research purposes. Subscribing institutions/libraries may also use articles for non-commercial educational purposes by making any number of copies for course packs or course reserve collections. Subscribing institutions/libraries may also loan single copies of articles to non-commercial libraries for educational purposes.
All copies of abstracts and articles must preserve their copyright notice without modification.