Evol Ecol Res 9: 185-197 (2007) Full PDF if your library subscribes.
Boldness in anti-predator behaviour and immune defence in field crickets
Raine Kortet,1* Markus J. Rantala2 and Ann Hedrick3
1Behaviour, Ecology and Evolution Team (Integrative Ecology Unit), Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland, 2Section of Ecology, Department of Biology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland and 3Section of Neurobiology, Physiology and Behavior, College of Biological Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA, USA
Address all correspondence to Raine Kortet, Department of Biology, University of Oulu, PO Box 3000, FIN-90014 Oulu, Finland.
Questions: Are prey animals’ behavioural responses against predation associated with their ability to resist parasites and pathogens, and if so, how is this adjusted in different populations?
Methods: We studied the association between anti-predator behaviour and immune defence (encapsulation response and lytic activities of the haemolymph) using laboratory-reared male field crickets originating from two wild populations that differ in predation and parasitism risk. The anti-predator behaviours that we measured were as follows: (1) the animal’s latency to become active inside a safe refuge, (2) its latency to emerge from a safe refuge after disturbance, and (3) the animal’s freezing time following a separate alarm cue.
Results: Crickets originating from a high-parasitoid, high-predation risk population (Arizona) had higher encapsulation responses than crickets from a low-parasitoid, low-predation risk population (California). Lytic activity correlated negatively with freezing time. Encapsulation response was positively correlated with the latency to become active and latency to emerge from a safe refuge in the high-predation risk population, but not in the low-predation risk population.
Conclusion: Predation and parasitoids may increase the cricket’s investment in parasite resistance, despite the potential costs of anti-predator behaviour.
Keywords: anti-predator response, cost, field cricket, Gryllus, immunocompetence.
DOWNLOAD A FREE, FULL PDF COPY
IF you are connected using the IP of a subscribing institution (library, laboratory, etc.)
or through its VPN.
© 2007 Raine Kortet. All EER articles are copyrighted by their authors. All authors endorse, permit and license Evolutionary Ecology Ltd. to grant its subscribing institutions/libraries the copying privileges specified below without additional consideration or payment to them or to Evolutionary Ecology, Ltd. These endorsements, in writing, are on file in the office of Evolutionary Ecology, Ltd. Consult authors for permission to use any portion of their work in derivative works, compilations or to distribute their work in any commercial manner.
Subscribing institutions/libraries may grant individuals the privilege of making a single copy of an EER article for non-commercial educational or non-commercial research purposes. Subscribing institutions/libraries may also use articles for non-commercial educational purposes by making any number of copies for course packs or course reserve collections. Subscribing institutions/libraries may also loan single copies of articles to non-commercial libraries for educational purposes.
All copies of abstracts and articles must preserve their copyright notice without modification.